Adams v. Lockwood, Englehart & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Court. Action by Lockwood, Englehart & Co. against Adams and another, to recover on three notes.' At the January Term, 1883, of the district court, plaintiffs had judgment for $258.65 and costs against defendants. They bring this judgment, and also the overruling of their motion to discharge the attachment in the action, to this court for review. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
This was an action on three notes, in connection with which were certain attachment proceedings. So far as any question is presented as to the petition, the ruling of the district court will be affirmed, on the authority of Ambrose v. Parrott, 28 Kas. 693. A motion was made to discharge the attachment, which was overruled. After it had been overruled, defendants filed a second motion to discharge the attachment upon different grounds. This motion was filed .apparently without any leave of the court. Upon a *374hearing it was also overruled, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ferguson v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Wright v. RaglandTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Ambrose v. ParrottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Robinson v. BurtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Graham v. BradburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
3Cited by12 opinions
- Henderson v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Dellwo v. PetersenIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Enderlin State Bank v. JenningsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Kesler v. LaphamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- FERNCO, INC. v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.