Adult Video Association Poe, Inc. And Roe, Inc. v. United States Department of Justice William Barr Patrick Trueman Edward Bryant and Dan L. Newsom
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Adult Video Association, Poe, Inc., and Roe, Inc., (“Adult Video”), appeal the dismissal of this declaratory judgment action. The district court found that Adult Video lacked standing because it had not alleged a sufficient injury in fact, and that there existed no “case” or “controversy.” We agree with the district court that Adult Video has not alleged a sufficient injury or threat of injury, and does not have standing to pursue declaratory relief. We also believe that, even if Adult Video had standing, its claim is not yet ripe for review.
On October 22,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Warshak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Parsons v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Sánchez v. Secretario de JusticiaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
- Speech First, Inc. v. Mark SchlisselCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Philip R. Joelson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.