Legal Opinion

United States v. State Forwarding & Shipping Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1926No. 2512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The merchandise imported here is shown by the evidence to be pieces of sheepskin leather. The sheepskin has been split and the pieces imported made from the grain part. The two official samples are colored scarlet and blue, respectively, but whether this coloring was done in the tanning or afterward, does not appear. The pieces of leather were cut from the hides and are about 10^ by 7% inches in size; nothing further has been done to them. They are ordered by the importer, engaged in the business of book binding and publishing, to be made into book backs for certain sets of books which it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Kleinberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Devoy v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Bahnsen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. United States v. RingkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Ellison v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Sheffler Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API