Legal Opinion

Mercado v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 16, 2012No. 20100627-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

VOROS, Associate Presiding Judge:

1 Plaintiffs Oscar Mercado and Maricela Quispe appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Lindsey Hill and Diamond Line Delivery System, the court's denial of Plaintiffs' motion for a new trial or to alter or amend the summary judgment in favor of Diamond Line, and the court's denial of a motion to quash or withdraw admissions. We affirm.

T2 Plaintiffs were involved in a traffic accident in February 2007. They sued Defendants in November 2007, alleging negligence. Plaintiffs challenge a series of rulings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Gardner v. BD. OF CTY. COM. OF WASATCH CTY.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Langeland v. Monarch Motors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State, in the Interest of E.R.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  5. Rorke v. Savoy Energy, LPMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cheek v. Iron CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. Red Bridge Capital, LLC v. Jar Family Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Discover Bank v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API