Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2000No. 0013 W.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

James W. Meyer has appealed from the Order of the Superior Court that affirmed the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) that determined that certain early retirement incentive benefits, received by him after separation from Elaine M. Meyer, were marital property.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The parties to the instant lawsuit were married in October of 1969, separated on August 15,1982, and divorced in October of 1987. Mr. Meyer worked as a trolley driver throughout the length of the marriage, while Mrs. Meyer was a homemaker and primary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berrington v. BerringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. LaBuda v. LaBudaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bianchi v. BianchiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Martinez v. Martinez, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2014
  4. Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API