Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2007No. 62 MAP 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baer

Over the past two decades, this Court has divided repeatedly with respect to the proper method for equitably distributing defined benefit pensions between employee and non-employee spouses. Faced once again with determining what portion of a pension, including any postseparation increase in the pension, is marital property subject to equitable division, we *84revisit the divergent policies expressed in our prior cases and examine the legislature’s response in amending the Divorce Code’s definition of marital property to address defined benefit pensions. See 23 Pa.C.S. § 3501(c)(1). After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Berrington v. BerringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. HenleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  2. City of New Castle Police Pension Plan v. Lepore, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2011
  3. Lux v. Lux, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2010
  4. Martinez v. Martinez, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2014
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API