Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Harris

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 7, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanley N. Egeth, J.

The parties to this personal injury action have agreed to submit to the court for resolution as a matter of law, the question as to whether services rendered by a chiropractor, which encompass physiotherapy and diathermy treatments, are properly includable in determining compliance with the threshold requirements of the No-Fault Insurance Law (Insurance Law, § 671, subd 4, par [b]).

If it is determined that such items are includable, it is conceded that the bills are reasonable and necessary, and that plaintiff shall then recover judgment of $2,500 inclusive of interest, costs and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Sanders v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Colenzo v. KernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Badke v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. Goldwire v. YoungsNew York Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. HelbigNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Moren v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API