Santiago v. Harris
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtShanley N. Egeth, J.
The parties to this personal injury action have agreed to submit to the court for resolution as a matter of law, the question as to whether services rendered by a chiropractor, which encompass physiotherapy and diathermy treatments, are properly includable in determining compliance with the threshold requirements of the No-Fault Insurance Law (Insurance Law, § 671, subd 4, par [b]).
If it is determined that such items are includable, it is conceded that the bills are reasonable and necessary, and that plaintiff shall then recover judgment of $2,500 inclusive of interest, costs and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sanders v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Colenzo v. KernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Badke v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Goldwire v. YoungsNew York Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. HelbigNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Moren v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978