Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company protests, primarily on procedural grounds, an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission that included “bumped” junior railway employees in the class of persons affected by Seaboard’s acquisition of joint control of the Richmond Broad Street Station.1 We find that the commission had authority to enter its order and the result it reached was proper.
The background of this proceeding can be briefly sketched. For many years employees of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company operated the Main Street Station in Richmond, Virginia, for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES'ASSOCIATION v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963
- Smith & Solomon Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Bradley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Clearfield Cheese Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1969
- Raye & Co. Transports, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970