Bradley v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARIE, District Judge.
This action seeks to enjoin and set aside the enforcement of a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission, entered January 25, 1963, and on which a final order was entered on July 7, 1966. The Commission, after a hearing, denied a petition to reconsider.the limits of the authority granted in the certificate issued to the plaintiffs pursuant to § 206 (a), the “grandfather” clause of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 306(a). The plaintiffs have exhausted administrative remedies and this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
- Chemical Leaman, Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Connecticut Limousine Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Connecticut Limousine Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
- Chemical Leaman, Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979