Chapman v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McGHEE, Justice.
The question before us in this litigation is the authority of the City of Albuquerque to enact its ordinances number 1075 and number 1085 and to enforce them through regulations granting certain exemptions and making certain distinctions. The purpose of enacting both ordinances was to make available increased funds for the operation and maintenance of the water and sewer facilities operated by the city.
Ordinance number 1075 reads in part as follows:
“Section 2. There is hereby imposed upon all improved lots or unsubdivided land within the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parsons v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Carson v. Brockton Sewerage CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Town of Clayton v. Colorado &. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- In Re Public Service Electric and Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Smith v. Mayor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Clovis v. CrainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Kennedy v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Wing v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Opinion No. (2009), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2009