Schultz v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISON EDWARD SCHULTZ PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-139-GNS COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This is a pro se civil-rights action. Plaintiff Edward Schutlz has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon review, IT IS ORDERED that this motion (DN 3) is GRANTED. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, this Court must screen the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will dismiss some claims and allow…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.