Legal Opinion

Bailey and Williams v. Westfall

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 27, 1987No. 05-85-01363-CVPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

An arbitration panel determined the amount G. David Westfall, an attorney, was entitled to receive under a written partnership agreement from his former law firm, Bailey and Williams, when he withdrew as a partner in the firm. Westfall sued to set aside the arbiters’ award. The trial court summarily vacated the arbitration award, ordered a jury trial de novo on the very same issues decided by the arbiters, and rendered judgment that Westfall recover an amount in excess of the arbitration award plus attorney fees. Bailey and Williams appeals. We hold that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. McKenzie Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. L. H. Lacy Co. v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Brazoria County v. KnutsonTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. County of Brazoria v. KnotsonTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bader v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Crossmark, Inc. v. Hazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  2. Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Ancor Holdings, LLC v. Peterson, Goldman & Villani, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  5. Statewide Remodeling, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API