Automobile Insurance v. Watson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Motions for new trial in the municipal court of Atlanta, when the principal sum sued for is in excess of $500, must be made under the same rules and regulations that govern such motions in the superior courts, and must therefore be in writing. Ga. L. 1925, pp. 370, 383; Civil Code (1910), § 6080. It follows, that where, in the municipal court of Atlanta, in a case in which the principal amount sued for was $1500, a verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff in the principal sum of $1113.20, and the defendant made no i written motion for a new trial during the term and within the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Garraux v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Taylor v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Pickens Co. v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Veal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Dobbs v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946