Legal Opinion

Automobile Insurance v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1929No. 18773PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Motions for new trial in the municipal court of Atlanta, when the principal sum sued for is in excess of $500, must be made under the same rules and regulations that govern such motions in the superior courts, and must therefore be in writing. Ga. L. 1925, pp. 370, 383; Civil Code (1910), § 6080. It follows, that where, in the municipal court of Atlanta, in a case in which the principal amount sued for was $1500, a verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff in the principal sum of $1113.20, and the defendant made no i written motion for a new trial during the term and within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Garraux v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Taylor v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Pickens Co. v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Veal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Dobbs v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API