McNeill v. Peaker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellant McNeill brought this action to cancel oil and gas leases which he had acquired on certain lands. He later assigned these leases to appellee Peaker. In these assignments, appellant reserved an overriding royalty in a percentage of the production. He received no cash or other consideration for the assignments. Peaker assigned the working interest to certain appellees, reserving also an overriding royalty interest, which he then assigned to others. This working interest was subsequently assigned by various appellees to other appellees who continued to produce some…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murdock v. Sure Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Henderson Company v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- XAE CORP. v. SMR Property Management Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Tidelands Royalty "B" Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
- Cebulka v. Eastern States Exploration Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County1991
- XAE CORP. v. SMR Property Management Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998