In Re Armstrong
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentRogers, Justice
I am unable to reconcile the ruling in this case with the ruling in the proceeding entitled In re Steiner, No. 36,315 of the docket of this court.
Steiner and two other persons were indicted for the use of the mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, in violation of section 215 of the Criminal Code. 18 U.S. C.A. § 338. The indictment charged that Steiner and his codefendants evolved and put into practice a scheme to procure fraudulent reductions on tax assessments on real and personal property in the City of New Orleans. Steiner, a lawyer, solicited and secured taxpayer clients, agreeing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Perez v. MerauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- In Re SteinerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- In Re FallonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943