Legal Opinion

Peña v. Fortuño

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 28, 2010No. 09-2569PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Fideicomiso de la Tierra del Caño Martin Peña (Land Trust of the Martin Peña Canal, hereinafter “Fideicomiso”), an entity created by legislation, brings an unusual Takings Clause claim. The Fideicomiso does not attack the exercise of government condemnation or eminent domain powers. Rather, the challenge is to Law 32, a legislative amendment to an earlier statute enacted in 2004. That earlier statute is Law 489, which the Fideicomiso correctly admits serves a number of public purposes and which created the Fideicomiso. Law 489 was implemented by, inter alia,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fideicomiso De La Tierra v. FortunoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. (HC) Raja v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. Figueroa v. Centurion of Arizona LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. In re Air Cargo Shipping Servs. Antitrust Litig.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. Ex Rel. Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers Retirement Plan v. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API