Paisley v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hely, Charles J., J.
A. Absence of a Demand Letter
Under G.L.c. 93A, §9(3), the demand letter requirements “shall not apply ... if the prospective respondent does not maintain a place of business or does not keep assets within the commonwealth ...” This means that a demand letter is not required if GMAC either does not maintain a place of business in the Commonwealth “or” does not keep assets within the Commonwealth.
GMAC does keep assets in the Commonwealth, for example, mortgage interests in Massachusetts real estate. The demand letter requirement is excused by the statutory language, however,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Latham v. Homecomings Financial LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010