Legal Opinion

Paisley v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 25, 2011No. PLCV201001077BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Hely, Charles J., J.

A. Absence of a Demand Letter

Under G.L.c. 93A, §9(3), the demand letter requirements “shall not apply ... if the prospective respondent does not maintain a place of business or does not keep assets within the commonwealth ...” This means that a demand letter is not required if GMAC either does not maintain a place of business in the Commonwealth “or” does not keep assets within the Commonwealth.

GMAC does keep assets in the Commonwealth, for example, mortgage interests in Massachusetts real estate. The demand letter requirement is excused by the statutory language, however,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Latham v. Homecomings Financial LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API