Legal Opinion

Williams v. Gridley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 1906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Helen M; Gridley, fvom a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in-the office of the clerk of the county of Onondaga on the 1st day of April, 1905, upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Nash, J.:

The plaintiffs were jobbers in bicycles, engaged in business, in - Springfield, Mass., under the firm name of P. A. Williams &• Co.

The defendant was engaged in the manufacture of bicycles at Syracuse, H. Y.

The parties entered'into a contract in writing, as follows:.

“ Syracuse, H. Y., Nov. 18th, 1902.
“ H. M. Gbidley, Syracuse, H. Y.:

Dear Madam.—-In addition to our order of Oct. 24th, 1902, you may enter our order for 3,000 (three thousand) of your Olive bicycles model Ho. 53, same to be stripped, or in other words, less tires, pedals, saddles, handle bars, tools and bag, at $8.75 each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Sattler v. . HallockNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Corse v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Ward v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Myers v. Hardin, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  2. House v. HornburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Gail v. GailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Beechwood Gun Club, Inc. v. City of BeaconNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Cory v. Logan Coal & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API