Legal Opinion
Wasielewski v. Town of Cheektowaga
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 21, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in this negligence action pursuant to CPLR 3216 based upon plaintiffs’ failure to comply with defendants’ 90-day demand to file a note of issue (see, Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499, 504-505; Burridge v Gaines, 281 AD2d 967 [decided herewith]; see also, Rowley v Carl Zeiss, Inc., 270 AD2d 835, lv denied 95 NY2d 766; Geise v Wetherill, 238 AD2d 952). In response to defendants’ demand…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hogan v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Geise v. WetherillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Barton v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Rowley v. Carl Zeiss, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hawe v. DelmarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- HAWE, RONALD L. v. DELMAR, TODDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Hawe v. DelmarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017