Legal Opinion

Geise v. Wetherill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 25, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, cross motion denied, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: In response to the demand of defendants pursuant to CPLR 3216, plaintiff neither filed a note of issue nor moved to vacate the 90-day demand or to extend the time within which to file a note of issue. Consequently, to avoid dismissal, it was necessary for plaintiff to demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the delay and a *953meritorious cause of action (see, Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499). Plaintiff did neither. Plaintiff’s virtual inaction since 1991 when…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Mosberg v. ElahiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Feeney v. Benderson Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Rowley v. Carl Zeiss, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Wasielewski v. Town of CheektowagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Burridge v. GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Schneider v. Cookson America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API