Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Beaton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1939No. 12534PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents error on the action of the trial court in sustaining a general demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition, and, plaintiffs declining to amend, dismissing the suit.

Appellants, Lawton McFarland, et al., instituted this suit against Ralph A. Bea-ton, Newton G. Flippen, H. A. Hardie and B. E. Haughton, alleging in substance, pertinent here, that they were and are the children of J. V. McFarland and Georgia McFarland, and that, at the death of their father, they inherited an undivided one-half interest in certain designated real and personal property of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jordan v. ImthurnTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. McGraw v. Merchants' & Planters' Nat. Bank of ShermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Tholl v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Coleman v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Brown v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cross v. Old Republic Surety Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Beaton v. McFarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Beaton v. McFarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Craven v. CulpepperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API