Legal Opinion
In Re Tucker
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 10, 2010No. 19-03516PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MANUEL BARBOSA, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of creditor Joe Cooling & Sons, Inc. (the “Movant”) for relief from the automatic stay. For the reasons set forth herein, the Movant’s motion is denied.
JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE
The Court has jurisdiction to decide this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and Internal Operating Procedure 15(a) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. It is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The central facts do not appear to be in dispute.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In the Matter of Richard E. BARKER, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Leaf v. McGowanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
- The Society of Lloyd's v. Patrick Collins, and Kathleen CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Highsmith v. Department of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Matter of FreundUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re StoneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2014
- Burciaga v. MogliaDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- In Re HedrickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
- Burciaga v. MogliaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019