Legal Opinion

Warren v. McGill

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1894No. 15404PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

Action to recover money due from an estate. The complaint avers, in substance, that Thomas Hovenden was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight dollars and six cents, and died leaving a will in which the defend*154ant, McGill, was named as executor; that the will was admitted to probate, and letters testamentary were issued to defendant, who duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties as executor; that notice to creditors to present their claims was published, and thereafter, within the time prescribed, the claim of plaintiff)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Mitchell v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. F. A. Patrick & Co. v. AustinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gee Chong Pong v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Griffith v. LewinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API