Legal Opinion

Okazaki v. Sussman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1914No. 11642PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered April 18, 1913, dismissing an action for malicious prosecution, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant, plaintiff below, brought this action against the respondent for malicious prosecution. Issue was joined on the complaint, and a trial entered upon before a jury on February 19, 1913. On February 21, 1913, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the appellant for $3,500. On February 24, 1913, a formal judgment, signed by the judge of the court, was entered in favor of the appellant on the verdict for the sum returned therein. On the same day (February 24, 1913), but whether before or after the entry of the judgment the record does not disclose, the respondent filed a motion for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. McConihe v. SteinerWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Lundin v. Superior Court for King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Chenoweth v. PrewettArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McCaffrey v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In re the Estate of HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API