Legal Opinion

McCaffrey v. Snapp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1917No. 13618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered April 1, 1916, modifying a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Fullerton, J. —

The appellants, being the owners of certain furniture and fixtures in a hotel in the city of Seattle, together with a lease of the hotel property, contracted to sell the same to the respondent for the sum of $1,800. As a consideration for the sale, the respondent paid to the appellants the sum of $300 and agreed to pay the balance in monthly installments in varying amounts, the deferred payments being evidenced by promissory notes. The deferred payments were secured by a deed to certain real property *203in a neighboring city, the contract providing that, if the purchaser should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McConihe v. SteinerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Okazaki v. SussmanWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Keith v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. SampsonWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Seattle-First National Bank v. TreiberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Schmelling v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Huseby v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API