Legal Opinion

Michigan Paneling Machine & Manufacturing Co. v. Parsell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Genesee. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The plaintiffs replevied from the defendant a paneling machine, and the question in controversy related to the ownership of this machine, at the time the suit was brought. The plaintiff gave evidence of having purchased it of one Bice, through John Warren his agent, and also of having purchased the right to manufacture and use machines of the kind in the counties of Genesee, Saginaw and Bay, under the letters patent which had been issued therefor. A contract between the plaintiff of the first part and John Warren and Lester Cross of the second part was then proved, *478under which Warren and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Fowler v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Truesdail v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Harbaugh v. People ex rel. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bond v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Saginaw Medicine Co. v. BateyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Freda v. TishbeinMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Johnson v. StellwagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API