Legal Opinion

Berghoffen v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion by plaintiff as a taxpayer to continue a temporary injunction. Further facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtEawhence, J.

This is a motion on the part of the plaintiff, as a taxpayer, to continue a temporary .injunction restraining the defendants from entering into any contract based upon the bids received for doing the -work mentioned in the complaint, from receiving deliveries of materials and supplies thereunder, and" enjoining and restraining the defendant, James P. Keating, as commissioner of highways of the city of New York, from carrying out or attempting to carry out any pretended contracts entered into in pursuance of the advertisement or letting referred to in said complaint, and enjoining and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kittinger v. . Buffalo Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Paul v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Sheehy v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Terrell v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Boon v. City of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eckerle v. FerrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API