Legal Opinion

Barksdale v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 20, 2024No. 24-1102Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims CHRISTOPHER S. BARKSDALE, Plaintiff, No. 24-cv-1102 v. Filed: November 20, 2024 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Christopher S. Barksdale, Cleveland, Ohio, appearing pro se. Joshua David Tully, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., appearing for Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Recognizing the importance of access to federal courts, Congress first enacted the federal in forma pauperis (IFP) statute in 1892. See Neitzke v. Williams,

490 U.S. 319, 324

(1989). That statute, as amended, is now…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API