Legal Opinion

Cheesman v. Nicholl

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1902No. 2186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, P. J.

' Appellee, who was plaintiff in the suit, and six others conveyed to the defendant their interest in certain unpatented placer mining claims. The consideration recited in the deed was $2,200.00, hut it is claimed that prior to and at the time of the execution and delivery of the deed, there was an oral agreement between the parties whereby the defendant should pay to the plaintiff and his co-owners the sum of $1,300.00 additional, if the defendant ever htilized the property for any purpose. It is admitted that prior to the commencement of this suit, defendant had utilized the property in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  2. Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Pickett v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  5. Union Gold Mining Co. v. Rocky Mountain National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sutherlin v. BloomerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Globe Express Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Silver Mountain Mine Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Bonanza Milling Co. v. BorregoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API