Legal Opinion

Kaczor v. Murrow

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1984No. C6-84-724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The trial court granted summary judgment on Kaczor’s negligence claims against Murrow. The court concluded that Murrow was driving in the proper lane at a legal rate of speed and did not contribute to the cause of a fatal accident. Kaczor appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

A fatal, head-on collision occurred November 24, 1982. Respondent was driving a pickup truck in the proper lane of a two-lane highway at a speed between 50 and 55 miles per hour, delivering newspapers for the Brainerd Dispatch. He observed a vehicle following him which attempted to pass but pulled back. Respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nash v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Dempsey v. JaroscakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Prink v. TonakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Moe v. Springfield Milling Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API