Friends of the East Lake Sammamish Trail v. City of Sammamish

ORDER

COUGHENOUR, District Judge.

This matter has come before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 24), Intervenor-Defen-dant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 39), and Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 41). The Court has considered the papers submitted by the parties in support of and in opposition to the motions and determined that oral argument is not necessary. For the reasons set forth in this Order, Plaintiffs’ Motion is hereby GRANTED, Inter-venor-Defendant’s Motion is hereby DENIED, and Defendant’s Cross Motion is likewise DENIED.

I.…