Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Fifth Third Bank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1988No. C-870265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Each of the three plaintiffs in this action purchased an automobile from a Cincinnati-area car dealer; the dealers arranged financing through the defendant, Fifth Third Bank. Shortly after making their purchases, the plaintiffs sued the bank, claiming that their installment contracts were in violation of the Ohio Retail Installment Sales Act, R.C. Chapter 1317 (“RISA”). The trial court granted the bank’s motion for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs filed this appeal.

In their single assignment of error, the plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in granting the bank’s motion for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huntington National Bank v. ElkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank One, Dayton, N.A. v. DoughmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Vannoy v. Capital Lincoln-Mercury Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Jackson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Jackson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API