Legal Opinion

Lovett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1925No. A-5012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

From a conviction in the county court of Choctaw county on a charge of disturbing religious worship, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed.

An information was filed charging the defendant, G. A. Lovett, and his wife, Mrs. G. A. Lovett, with the offense of disturbing religious worship. Upon the trial, Mrs. G. A. Lovett was acquitted, and the defendant, G. A. Lovett, convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100. Two assignments of error are suggested to the court: First, that the information does not sufficiently charge an offense; second, that the evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Holsman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. United States Zinc Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Buffo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API