Legal Opinion
In Re Kay
California Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1970No. Crim. 13533PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Cal.3d 930 (1970)
464 P.2d 142
83 Cal. Rptr. 686
In re THOMAS PATRICK KAY et al., on Habeas Corpus.
Docket No. Crim. 13533.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
January 30, 1970.
COUNSEL
Joe C. Ortega for Petitioners.
A.L. Wirin, Fred Okrand, Laurence R. Sperber and Tony Geram as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
Byron C. Morton, District Attorney, and Ross I. Gallen, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.
OPINION
TOBRINER, J.
Petitioners James Caswell,[1] Thomas Patrick Kay, Alfred Figueroa, and Raul Loya were convicted by a jury of disturbing a lawful meeting, a misdemeanor, in violation of…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cpr for Skid Row v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Cpr for Skid Row v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015