Legal Opinion
In re the City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 22, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
In these consolidated condemnation proceedings appeals have been taken from the third and fourth separate and partial final decrees, by Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc. and Surface Transit, Inc., respectively, and by the City of New York. We affirm in substantial reliance on the comprehensive and forward-looking opinion of Mr. Justice Hecht at Special Term.
Various and complex problems of valuation are indigenous to eminent domain proceedings, and seldom can they be resolved with mathematical precision. The judicial endeavor has been “ to find working rules that will do substantial justice ”,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Banner Milling Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Onondaga County Water Authority v. New York Water Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968