Legal Opinion

State v. Olhausen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1998No. 20310PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] We must decide if a tipster’s warning to police of a “possible drug transaction” was sufficient to justify stopping an automobile to further investigate. Because the description the tip provided fit the car the deputy spotted and the dispatcher confirmed that a warrant was “associated with the vehicle,” we conclude the stop and subsequent seizure of controlled substance was lawful. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress and the jury’s verdict.

Facts

[¶2.] On March 19, 1997, Alan Olhausen, Jr. drove his newly purchased, black 1994 BMW to Sioux…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HerrmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. SchollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. SweedlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. GrahamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. SatterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API