Legal Opinion

State v. Stepniewski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1982No. 80-750-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the state must prove intentional conduct by a defendant in all charged circumstances of a violation of *263sec. 10.0.26(3), Stats. 1977,1 for a conviction. This issue involves a statutory construction and constitutional requirements of due process. The trial court, the Honorable Ted E. Wedemeyer, Jr., in a trial to the court held that intent is not a requisite to be shown for all charged circumstances and that due process was not violated. The court of appeals agreed, and we affirm.

The defendant, Edward Malee, also challenges the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. StoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. GulrudCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. State v. VoneshCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API