Legal Opinion

Michael Antonelli v. Mark Tipton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 16, 2009No. 08-3123UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Former federal inmate Michael Antonel-li brought suit for damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) against officials at the Federal Correctional Complex in Arkansas. He alleged that defendants retaliated against him for filing grievances, and violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights, as well as his right to due process. The district court 1 dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. Anto-nelli appeals. After careful de novo…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Kenneth A. Marshall v. Stanley KnightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Donald Earl Atkinson v. Susan Bohn Phil JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adam Hill v. Robert AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026
  2. Maxwell/G-Doffee v. SimmonsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API