Legal Opinion

Yarema v. Exxon Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 28, 1986No. 49, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

The Court of Special Appeals dismissed the appeal in this case for want of appellate jurisdiction, holding that the order of appeal was premature. We then granted a petition for a writ of certiorari to review this jurisdictional issue, which involves the relation between Maryland Rule 2-503(a), concerning consolidation of separate actions and judgments in consolidated actions, and Maryland Rule 2-602, concerning judgments in actions involving multiple claims or multiple parties. The case also presents a second issue relating to appellate jurisdiction, involving the operation…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Donald R. Huene and Annette S. Huene v. United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Goins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. East v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Cole v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Allstate Insurance v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. County Council v. OffenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API