Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McCartha v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 25, 2011No. CR-09-0461Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WELCH, Presiding Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part as substituted on application for rehearing on May 27, 2011.

When this Court issued its opinion on original submission in this case on March 25, 2011, I issued a special writing concurring in part and dissenting in part. On application for rehearing, I withdraw that special writing and substitute the following therefor.

I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the circuit court’s denial of the relief requested as to the substantive claims in *1020Tony Mark McCartha’s second Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition. However, I respectfully…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. NielsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Schenher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API