Bland v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant insists that we were in error in holding admissible the testimony showing that about seven months prior to the robbery, Jewel Rexrode, while in the store of Price Clements, exhibited to Clements a roll of money in bills, as complained of in Bill of Exception No. 5. The objection to this testimony was that it was remote, hearsay, and that no conspiracy was shown as would authorize the proof. In addition to the facts set forth in the original opinion, the following are shown:

Appellant and Merle Brandt were identified as the actual…