Legal Opinion
Prisco v. Stroup
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 2008No. 05-FM-1086PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to increase child support and request for attorney’s fees. She challenges the trial court’s finding that neither appellee’s change in income nor alleged changes in the children’s needs merit an increase in child support, as well as the trial court’s exclusion of a booklet prepared by appellant which she claims contained the documentary foundation for the expenses set forth on her financial statement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court denying appellant’s request for modification of child support and for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weiner v. KnellerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Moorehead v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Steadman v. SteadmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Stebbins v. StebbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Burnette v. VoidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Malik Corp. v. Tenacity Group, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wilson v. CraigDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mazza v. HollisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Prisco v. StroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Carome v. CaromeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.