Legal Opinion

Becenti-Aguilar v. Begay

Navajo Nation Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2016No. SC-CV-51-16Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Theresa Beeenti-Aguilar filed a post-election complaint claiming Steven Begay was not qualified at the filing of his candidacy application because he was in the permanent employment of a federal agency. The Office of Hearings and Appeals ruled that Begay was eligible to run for Council Delegate and should be allowed to take the oath of office because the Navajo Election Administration and Begay agreed before the election that Begay would be allowed to run with the stipulation that if elected, he would resign. OHA’s decision is reversed and remanded.

I

After the removal of Mel R. Begay…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re WagnerNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sandoval v. Navajo Election AdministrationNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Navajo Election Administration v. ShirleyNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gishey v. BegayNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Tsosie v. DescheneNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API