Legal Opinion
Orsetti v. Orsetti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated March 10, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied, as academic, their cross motion to compel the defendants to provide certain discovery.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
*684It is well settled that a party seeking to obtain title by adverse possession must establish, by clear and convincing evidence, the common-law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Katona v. LowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Bockowski v. MalakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Harbor Estates Ltd. Partnership v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gore v. CambareriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Guariglia v. Blima Homes, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dunkin Donuts of New York, Inc. v. Mid-Valley Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Janoff v. DisickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Oppedisano v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Dodge v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005