Legal Opinion
Marilyn Medberry v. Leo Hegstrom, Director of Human Resources
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1986No. 84-3866PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment upholding the State of Oregon’s method of determining the period of ineligibility for payments following receipt of nonrecurring lump sum income. Because the method used is inconsistent with the applicable federal regulation, we reverse.
BACKGROUND
The State of Oregon, through its Adult and Family Services Division (AFS), participates in the jointly funded federal-state AFDC program established by the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 601 et…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Antonio Ventura-Escamilla and Rosa Maria Martinez De Ventura v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Donald Joe Moorhead, Dba Don Moorhead Harvesting Company v. United States of America, Clifton Gattis, Dba Packing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Committee for an Independent P-I v. Hearst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Abolfazl Salehpour v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Horizon Mutual Savings Bank v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vance v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kingman Lambert Cynthia A. Lambert Kristen Lambert Kimberly Lambert v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Diaz v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Vance v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Coppola v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.