Legal Opinion

Claim of Nielsen v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEyiodes, J.

Upon sufficient supporting evidence the Board has found that claimant was employed as an investigator by the appellant-employer; that while engaged in the regular course of his employment he became disabled due to an infected right toe and lymphangitis, resulting from the breaking of a blister on the right toe, which blister resulted from the nature of his employment which required excessive walking from place to place and was a process involving the continuous rubbing of his foot and shoe.

The Board further found that the disease from which claimant *240was suffering was an occupational disease…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Scoville v. . Tolhurst Machine WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Claim of Commissioner of Taxes & Finance v. Union Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kalee v. Dewey Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. St. Louis Mailers' Union Local No. 3 v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Kalee v. Dewey Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API