Legal Opinion

Matter of Scoville v. . Tolhurst Machine Works

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 15, 1920, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant in the course of his employment was obliged to use a pair of pliers. The constant use thereof caused a blood blister in the palm of his hand.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 15, 1920, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant in the course of his employment was obliged to use a pair of pliers. The constant use thereof caused a blood blister in the palm of his hand. There was testimony that the blister broke, became infected through his continuance at work, and resulted in a palmar abscess which caused the partial loss of the use of the right hand. Defendant contended that claimant’s…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Nielsen v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Claim of Walters v. U. S. Vitamin Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Claim of Stone v. Marshall Bull StudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Claim of Torrey v. Matteawan Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Claim of Walters v. U. S. Vitamin Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API