Legal Opinion

Board of Selectmen v. Granfield

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 24, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The selectmen brought this action to terminate the defendants’ use of certain premises as a boarding house. The complaint consisted of three counts. The first sought a determination that boarding houses are not a permitted use under the Tewksbury zoning by-law and an injunction prohibiting the defendants from using the premises as such. The second sought the same injunctive relief based on a contention that the defendants’ operation of a boarding house without a license was unlawful. The third sought an order in the nature of mandamus to compel the town’s building commissioner (who in his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neuhaus v. Building Inspector of MarlboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  2. McDonald's Corp. v. Town of SeekonkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. William C. Bearce Corp. v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. City of Woburn v. McNutt Bros. Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vokes v. Avery W. Lovell, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Balcam v. Town of HinghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Clark & Clark Hotel Corp. v. Building Inspector of FalmouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. A. Graziano, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API