Legal Opinion

Kerns v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2013No. SD 31722PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, RJ.

Johnnie Jerome Kerns (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief. He raises two points on appeal: (1) the motion court erred in denying his claim that his guilty plea was involuntary because plea counsel assured him that his sentences would be ordered to be served concurrently, and (2) the motion court erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for (a) failing to spend sufficient time with Movant to discuss the case, and (b) failing to fully investigate the case.2 We disagree and affirm.

Factual and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. Garris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. State v. CellaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lynn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Damon Tatum, Petitioner/Respondent v. Mercedeas TatumMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. May v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. JAMES D. MORELAND, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. JOSHUA JOHNSON, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API