State ex rel. Cunningham v. Romero
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, San Miguel County; Leahy, Judge. Action by the State, on the relation of J. M, Cunningham and another, administrators of the estate of F. H. Pierce, for mandamus to Eugenio Eomero, treasurer and ex-officio collector of taxes of San Miguel County. From a judgment for relators, defendant appeals. STATEMENT OP PACTS.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, San Miguel County; Leahy, Judge. Action by the State, on the relation of J. M, Cunningham and another, administrators of the estate of F. H. Pierce, for mandamus to Eugenio Eomero, treasurer and ex-officio collector of taxes of San Miguel County. From a judgment for relators, defendant appeals. STATEMENT OP PACTS. This is an action for mandamus against the county-treasurer of San Miguel county to compel him to receive a certain sum of money tendered and claimed by relators to be. sufficient to redeem certain lands, from a tax sale previously made for delinquent…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
TiANNA, J.
(after stating the facts as above.) The only question for our determination is whether an owner of real estate which has been sold to the county for delinquent taxes for two or more 3rears prior to April 1, 1915, ma3>- redeem the' same by the payment of the amount for which the certificate of sale has been sold and assigned hv the county to a third party, or whether such owner must pay the original amount for -which the property was sold to the county.
[1] It is the contention of appellant that the Glen Investment Company, the purchaser of the tax certificates in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Empire Furniture Co. v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Glen Inv. Co. v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Crawford v. DillardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- McNutt v. LovelaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933